Cheaper dismissal not exceed 20% unemployment
The president of the CEOE, Gerardo Díaz Ferrán, has warned in the special debate on Spanish TV (announced yesterday in this blog) that if not cheaper dismissal, the unemployment rate will exceed 20 percent of the workforce .
You really can think that the fall of dismissal will encourage procurement? I rather think it will lead to greater insecurity and less stability in the posts.
Ojo! "Flexibility" (something largely bound in modern times) should not be synonymous with "precarious" as some claim.
The days of compensation available so far worked mostly as a sort of guarantee that there were "redundancies" lightning ", but as it stands now the crisis, even
Moreover, what does he mean when he says that Candido Mendez to overcome the crisis to do "what was never made? You mean I knew that measures had to be done and yet did not? Or does it refer to at the moment must be applied imagination?
Also to know if when Mendez refers to the "trust deficit" does in relation to banking (as they do now most experts) or to society in general.
It is important what he says about the necessary Toxo "vigilance" on ERES. If this did not exist or were eliminated, we would probably now going to many more abuses by companies.
Actually the problem is raised from the business perspective, so I doubt that the ultimate aim of this measure is job creation, but rather the reduction of expenditure on corporate balance sheets, trying to be more profitable and productive .
From this figure, nothing good can be expected: he wanted to raise the VAT (punishing the final consumer), promoting part-time employment (as if you could bank some of the debts monthly charge) that EREs are without any agreement with works councils ... ..
Simply everything that comes from the mouth of this man are nothing but attacks on workers rights.
Will you do something the unions?